توظيف الآيات والأحاديث في الخطاب السياسي الإسلامي

Abstract

Verses of the Qur’an have been used for the purposes of defending controversial views, and interpreting them for the sake of political interest, which is a wrong use that is not part of religion in anything, and verses and hadiths are employed for a purpose that may or may not be correct. The concept of religion differs from the function of religion, as the function of the divine religion is It is crystallized in clarifying the true belief, which is the belief in one God that is not like him, as well as the method of worship, and in the field of transactions, achieving justice between human beings through the orders and prohibitions mentioned in the Sharia. Some religious movements have sought to subjugate religion and distort it to serve political purposes, deviations and grievances that are inferred by verses and hadiths, an insult to religion and a distortion of it. They welcome the politicization of religion even if it is wrong. In terms of evidence, vis-à-vis two textual times, "the time of reception and the time of recording" are both assumed and probable in order to be read in the light of the two dates, the history of the state before the first on the one hand, and the history of states, sects and doctrines that have worn or activated the stage of codification on the other hand, and the Sunnah in terms of roses and the Sunnah Frequent interruption of roses on the authority of the Prophet - may God’s prayers and peace be upon him - because the frequency of transmission indicates the assertion and severance of the report, and the famous Sunnah is that roses are cut off from the Companions or Companions who received it on the authority of the Prophet - may God bless him and grant him peace - because of the frequency of transmission from them, but it is not definitive about the roses from the Messenger. It is self-evident that any organization aiming at power should be based on two foundations: the first: the ideological organizational basis, regardless of the credibility of the thought or the validity of its conformity with reality and its results, and the second: the compulsory or compulsive basis crystallized in the concept of "military" physical force. From this standpoint, we can talk about two areas of movement. One with one content and one goal, each field specializes in a different way from the other, they meet in terms and objectives, and it is not necessary for the two fields to originate in one period of time, as most of the theoretical aspects preceded the side of material strength in the period of time, and this precedence differs in shortness or length of duration From one movement to another according to the circumstances of the age and the corresponding challenges. This applies to religious movements that are based on employing religion for an authoritarian goal.