dc.description.abstract |
Andalusia reached the peak of its political, military, economic and scientific prosperity,
and it was a jewel in the good of civilization, and suddenly there was a crack and collapse in
that great structure that the Umayyads had worked hard to establish for more than two and a
half centuries, which indicates the existence of weaknesses in that structure, represented in
the Tribal disputes, racism, and political conflicts, and the strange thing is that the collapse
happened very quickly, not commensurate with the length of time it took to build and
construct, and perhaps this was in line with divine laws. “And if we want to destroy a
village, we command it to be well-off, and they commit it to them”.
God Almighty has authorized destruction to plunge the extreme people into luxury (the
era of the caliphate 316-399). The matter of immorality, such as Chanjul, the Mahdi, and
others, they penetrated through the lands, and committed sins, vices, and evils, and with their
hands and their ugly deeds that betray ignorance and mismanagement, they wrote the last
pages of the history of the Umayyad Caliphate in Andalusia.
Abd al-Rahman al-Dakhil was able to establish a state for him in Andalusia and make the
rule hereditary in his family for nearly three centuries. Thus, Andalusia recovered from what
was mired in it from the struggle for power between Al-Qaysiyyah and Al-Yamaniya. - He
took over the authorities and the state’s management of the veil of Muhammad ibn Abi
Aamer al-Mansur, who arrived in the situation until he commanded to greet the kings, but he
aspired to be the caliph The Most Merciful, known for his shrewdness, coveted the caliphate
and asked the legal caliph (Al-Moayad) to appoint him as guardian for his reign, and that
request was the spark that unleashed the discord that Andalusians plagued for many years
and which ultimately led to the weakening of the caliphate’s position and its downfall in 422
AH
The topic of “Ameri tyranny in power and its impact on the fall of the Umayyad
caliphate in 422 AH” is one of the important topics in the history of Andalusia. It was not
concerned with adequate care by researchers and needs more studies to find out the reasons
behind the weakness and impotence of the successors of the era of sedition (399-422 AH).
For managing things and directing them on the right track.
The importance of the topic lies in the fact that it was the beginning of the end of an era
that was considered one of the most brilliant eras of the state of Islam in Andalusia as a
whole, and an introduction to an era whose kings slogan was "the emirate, even on stones."
This study aims to clarify the negative role of the Amarites in weakening the position of
the caliph, robbing the authorities from his hands, displacing the Umayyad house and
harassing him, which led to the inability of most of the caliphs of sedition to run the affairs
of the state and the outbreak of conflict between them, in order to win the caliphate, and
what this conflict led to The bloody wars in which the enemies were used, the Andalusian
people were the most affected by them and the woes of them. This study aims to clarify the
negative role of the Amarites in weakening the position of the caliph, robbing the authorities
from his hands, displacing the Umayyad house and harassing him, which led to the inability
of most of the caliphs of sedition to run the affairs of the state and the outbreak of conflict
between them, in order to win the caliphate, and what this conflict led to The bloody wars in
which the enemies were used, the Andalusian people were the most affected by them and the
woes of them.
Perhaps the reason that pushed me to delve into this topic despite the lack of resources
that dealt with it and despite the grief and pain that the Arabs are experiencing in the current
era in terms of deteriorating conditions and sharp disagreements we found similar to them in
Andalusian history, but our hopes are that the fate will not be the same. Drawing inspiration
from lessons and lessons and trying to address problems in ways that we avoid falling into
the same caveats that our ancestors did
The study was divided into five demands, as well as an introduction, conclusion, and a list
of sources and references as follows: The first requirement: the peaceful transfer of power in
the era of the Umayyad emirate.
The second demand: Amiriya despotism in power. And the third requirement: the position
of the Umayyad House on the transfer of power to the Amarites. Fourth requirement: the
struggle for power between the Umayyads. Fifth requirement: the power struggle between
the Hammoudids and the Umayyads. |
en_US |